City of Portland

Nearly 900 strong, our Portland members keep the City moving, performing vital services in nearly every bureau that benefit the Portland community.

Chapter Officers

2026-2028

  • President
    Paul Cone
  • Vice-President
    Janet Tucker
  • Secretary
    Maggie Burant
  • Treasurer
    Debi Consani
  • Council Liaison
    Valency Astris
  • Lead Steward Coordinator
    Jeanette DeCastro
  • Welcome Officer
    Rachel Burlington

Stewards

Portland Stewards (Last Updated 3.24.26)

REC Delegates

  • Paul Cone
  • Jeanette DeCastro
  • Marissa DeMull
  • Maha Guliani
  • Leo Lal Mathew
  • Carol Lane
  • Christian Lopez
  • Dan Morrison
  • Niko Rice
  • Manish Thakore
  • Janet Tucker
  • Jorge Villavicencio

Union Rep


800-783-0017 ext. 113

Proud PROTEC17 Portland Chapter Members

Union Contract Negotiations – Feb. 2026

PROTEC17 Portland Chapter members gather for a photo at their contract negotiation session. They are smiling, raising their fists in solidarity, and holding up a homemade PROTEC17 banner for their Bargaining Team.

PROTEC17 Portland Chapter members pose for a photo after doing a clap in for their hardworking Bargaining Team! 👏

PROTEC17 Portland Chapter members demand that Mayor Wilson and City Administrator Lee:

  1. Fund our full Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) and preserve jobs
  2. Support remote work and flexible work schedules
  3. Honor the results of our long, overdue classification and compensation study

We deserve a fair union contract NOW!

Estimated bargaining timeline after our May 8 contract negotiations session:

A flow chart shows chronological dates and messages that read, "May 8: Reached a Tentative Agreement (TA) on essential employee language | Wednesdays in May: Costing Labs | May 29: Targeted Wage Adjustments | June 9: Affinity Day for Economics." There is a graphic of an arrow pointing to the right to indicate the flow.

Summary of Articles Status

ARTICLE NUMBER STATUS
Article 1: Recognition Union proposed Status Quo (SQ) on 9.10.25; TA’d on 11.5.25 âś“
Article 2: Union Security & Activities Consensus solution reached on 7.29.25; final language TA’d on 8.27.25 âś“
Article 3: Scope & Purpose Union proposed SQ on 9.10.25; TA’d on 11.5.25 âś“
Article 4: Management Rights
  • Section 4.3 TA’d in Interest Based Bargaining (IBB); final language TA’d on 8.27.25 âś“
  • Section 4.7 TA’d on 4.2.26 (adding pay equity language) âś“
  • IN PROGRESS: Union passed Section 4.4 on contracting out on 12.3.25; City countered on 2.18.26; Union countered on 5.8.26 a.m.; City countered on 5.8.26 p.m.
Article 5: Strikes & Lockouts Union proposed SQ on 9.10.25; TA’d on 11.5.25 âś“
Article 6: General Provisions
  • Section 4.4 TA’d in Interest Based Bargaining (IBB); final language established on 8.27.25 âś“
  • Section 6.7 on driving privileges and Section 6.8 on exit interviews; TA’d on 11.5.25 âś“
  • IN PROGRESS: Union passed Section 6.9 on Artificial Intelligence (AI) on 2.18.25; City denied all proposals on 3.10.26; Union countered on 5.8.26
Article 7: Labor Management Committee Union proposed SQ on 9.10.25; TA’d on 11.5.25 âś“
Article 8: Savings Clause Union proposed SQ on 9.10.25; TA’d on 11.5.25 âś“
Article 9: Duration OPEN
Article 10: Hours of Work (Includes Telework) OPEN (For Telework)
Article 11: Holidays Consensus solution reached on 1.23.26; final language TA’d on 5.8.26 âś“
Article 12: Sick Leave SQ âś“
Article 13: Family Leave City passed proposal on 6.4.25; Union countered on 6.4.25; City countered on 9.10.25; TA’d on 9.10.25 âś“
Article 14: Vacations No proposed changes, but open as part of economics
Article 15: Leaves of Absence Union passed proposal on 9.10.25; City countered; TA’d on 9.10.25 âś“
Article 16: Health & Welfare City passed proposal on 6.4.25; Union countered on 11.5.25; economic pieces deferred to Affinity Day
Article 17: Other Benefits No proposed changes, but open as part of economics
Article 18: Types of Employees Union passed proposal on 6.4.25; City countered on 9.10.25; Union countered on 1.23.26; City countered on 3.10.26; TA’d on 3.10.26 âś“
Article 19: Wages WOOC language, rest periods, and standby language (not rate) TA’d in Interest Based Bargaining (IBB); final language established on 2.18.26; some language was removed from Article 19.1 and moved to Article 4.7 and 4.2.26

REMAINS OPEN

Article 20: Seniority Consensus solution reached in Interest Based Bargaining (IBB); holding on final language because we still need to revisit Sections 3, 4, and 5
Article 21: Discipline & Discharge Union passed proposal on 9.10.25; City is disputing us opening this because it wasn’t named in May
Article 22: Settlement of Disputes City passed proposal on 6.4.25; Union countered on 6.4.25; TA’d on 6.4.25 âś“
Article 23: Professional Development Consensus solution reached on 7.29.25; final language TA’d on 8.27.25 âś“
Article 24: Reasonable Suspicion of Drug or Alcohol Use Union proposed SQ on 9.10.25; TA’d on 11.5.25 âś“
Article 25: Reductions in Workforce & Layoffs Consensus solution reached in Interest Based Bargaining (IBB); final language TA’d on 1.23.26 âś“
Schedule A: Salary Rates & Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) OPEN
Schedule B: Temporary Employees Reviewed as part of Article 18
Schedule C: Seasonal/Casual Employees Reviewed as part of Article 18
Language Premium Letter of Agreement Moved to Article 19.14; TA’d on 2.18.26 âś“
Volunteer Pilot Letter of Agreement Moved to Article 19.16; TA’d on 2.18.26 âś“
Information Technology (IT) Standby Letter of Agreement No proposed changes, but open as part of economics
Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) Standby Letter of Agreement No proposed changes, but open as part of economics
Appendix A: Classification Specialties
Requires updating after getting final language for Article 20
Portland Street Response TA’d on 10.28.25 âś“

Consensus Solution: A decision-making outcome where our union and management agree to support a final proposal, even if it is not everyone’s ideal preferred outcome.

Interest Based Bargaining (IBB): A collaborative negotiation strategy where parties focus on understanding and addressing each other’s underlying needs and interests to reach mutually beneficial agreements. IBB aims for a “win-win” outcome by exploring options that satisfy the core needs of all involved parties.

  • Interests: The intangible motivations that lead to a position. Our underlying hopes, concerns, and needs.
  • Options: Non-binding ideas generated from the basic question: How can we solve this problem and satisfy as many of our interests as possible?
  • Solution: Consensus on the Options that best address Interests. The Consensus Solution is turned into formal contract language, usually by a “language subcommittee” which is then signed as a TA.

SQ: Status Quo

TA’d: Successfully reached a Tentative Agreement (TA)/Completed